What's hilarious is that chapter 12 of book II essentially proposes a thesis as to why people watch FOX News. Fox news is the perfect example of a source of information that is absolutely not eloquent, is not a master of its subject, but rather is loud and full of energy that's not backed up with good rhetoric.
"[An ignorant speaker] appears to judges of bad taste the dryness of questions and arguments, and seek nothing else but matter in which they may please the ears of the court with senseless gratifications."FoX News does itself no pretend to be a legitimate source of news--they classify themselves as and "Entertainment" show in most guidebooks. And yet, people listen to what they say, feel empowered by what they say, quote the things they say, and believe what they say. And if you asked one of these followers of the Church of FOX, they would not tell you the enjoy the entertainment and the drama opponents of the program, they would tell you that they are hearing from the likes of Bill O'Reily the unfiltered, holy truth.
Thus the text was spot on when he said that ignorant speakers and easily give the appearance of being eloquent ones, can even seem to have more energy and prowess. "They howl on every occasion and bellow out everything with uplifted hand." They dramatize what they say, disguising the legitimacy of the facts in the quality of what is really just a performance.
Obviously, it would be entirely possible to a rue that this is total crap, and that FOX News is not as bad as I just made it out to be. Fair enough. But I find it amazing that points on oratory made far over a millennium ago still hold incredible truth, that we find Quintillian's "gladiators" of rhetoric in our lives all of the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment